[lowrisc-dev] Re: [musl] Weekly Report of Porting musl to RISC-V
masanori.ogino at gmail.com
Wed Jul 6 08:37:33 BST 2016
2016-07-03 23:24 GMT+09:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz at port70.net>:
> * Masanori Ogino <masanori.ogino at gmail.com> [2016-07-03 09:42:00 +0900]:
>> Some failures are expected since musl on x86_64 also does the same
>> ones (e.g. errors in src/api/fcntl.c), but there are some unexpected
>> errors too. I guess that the "warning: <the name of a header> is
>> shorter than expected" warning indicates bugs in arch-dependent part
>> of I/O functions or system calls (or kernel?) and it causes syntax
>> errors in the same compilation unit.
> try to figure out this error:
> cc1: warning: src/regression/printf-fmt-g-zeros.c is shorter than expected
> In file included from src/regression/printf-fmt-g-zeros.c:3:0:
> /usr/include/stdio.h:8:22: warning: /usr/include/features.h is shorter than expected
> #include <features.h>
> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:22:0,
> from src/regression/printf-fmt-g-zeros.c:3:
> /usr/include/bits/alltypes.h:46:19: error: missing ')' after "defined"
> #if defined(__NEED_suseconds_t) && !defined(__DEFINED_suseconds_t)
> is this a native toolchain?
> i thought you would cross compile things first
> (although libc-test is not set up to easily run
> the tests in a simulator after cross compiling)
> it might be some filesystem issue if there are
> truncated files.
Sure. I am trying to do cross-compiled tests.
More information about the lowrisc-dev