Baserock FAQ; btrfs speed
javier.jardon at codethink.co.uk
Fri Nov 25 19:35:43 GMT 2011
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 17:22 +0000, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Also, someone suggested that btrfs might be too slow for Baserock. I ran
> some tests using the bonnie++ tool, on a laptop, against a spinning
> disks (i.e., not on flash memory; didn't have a sufficiently large
> SD card available).
> fs type block write % of ext 4 block read % of ext4
> ext2 44909 85 68865 116
> ext3 44571 84 68782 116
> ext4 52787 100 59518 100
> btrfs 53118 101 54253 91
> The results are satisfactory, I think.
More detailed tests here, this time in a SSD drive 
More information about the baserock-dev