In article <3f1942964f.wra1th(a)wra1th.plus.com>,
Gavin Wraith <gavin(a)wra1th.plus.com> wrote:
In message <4f9640eeeedhwild(a)talktalk.net> you wrote:
> In article <26693e964f.thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk>,
> Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > LloydsTSB have "upgraded" their site with the
result that When I log
> > in the summary account page just gives a blank page. I Fiddled with
> > the source and discovered that removing one line solved the problem.
> > I discussed this with the guys at Wakefield today and they couldn't
> > reproduce the fault. I have stripped the code down to a few lines:
> > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
> > <html>
> > <html lang="en">
> > <p> "test"</p>
> > </html>
Great, thank you Geoffrey. I can reproduce the problem.
Thanks for the test case!
> Should you have two <html ... > lines?
And what about the <head> and <body> tags? I was always led to believe
that they were mandatory, and that the head chunk had to have a
Yes, the HTML is invalid, but this should not prevent NetSurf from
displaying the content. Plenty of invalid pages exist -- even high profile
sites like LloydsTSB -- so we have to support them.
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/