10:34 p.m.
Hi Guys,
LloydsTSB have "upgraded" their site with the result that When I log in
the summary account page just gives a blank page. I Fiddled with the
source and discovered that removing one line solved the problem. I
discussed this with the guys at Wakefield today and they couldn't
reproduce the fault. I have stripped the code down to a few lines:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<html lang="en">
<p> "test"</p>
</html>
On my system this gives a blank page. If I remove either <html> or the
next line it works.
Please can someone else try it to see if it behaves the same on their
system before I create a bug report.
I have tried 1.2 and 2.0 r4108, both behave the same.
(I am using a Kinetic RISC PC with 4.39)
TTFN
--
Geoff. Baxendale, Darwen, Lancashire.
Using Acorn StrongARM Kinetic RiscPC.
Oxymoron of the day: "Computer Security"
11:02 p.m.
In article <26693e964f.thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk>,
Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
LloydsTSB have "upgraded" their site with the result that
When I log in
the summary account page just gives a blank page. I Fiddled with the
source and discovered that removing one line solved the problem. I
discussed this with the guys at Wakefield today and they couldn't
reproduce the fault. I have stripped the code down to a few lines:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN">
<html>
<html lang="en">
<p> "test"</p>
</html>
Should you have two <html ... > lines?
--
David Wild using RISC OS on broadband
www.davidhwild.me.uk
11:15 p.m.
In message <4f9640eeeedhwild(a)talktalk.net> you wrote:
In article <26693e964f.thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk>,
Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> LloydsTSB have "upgraded" their site with the result that When I log in
> the summary account page just gives a blank page. I Fiddled with the
> source and discovered that removing one line solved the problem. I
> discussed this with the guys at Wakefield today and they couldn't
> reproduce the fault. I have stripped the code down to a few lines:
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
> <html>
> <html lang="en">
> <p> "test"</p>
> </html>
Should you have two <html ... > lines?
And what about the <head> and <body> tags? I was always led to believe
that they were mandatory, and that the head chunk had to have a
<title> subchunk.
--
Gavin Wraith (gavin(a)wra1th.plus.com)
Home page: http://www.wra1th.plus.com/
11:45 p.m.
In article <3f1942964f.wra1th(a)wra1th.plus.com>,
Gavin Wraith <gavin(a)wra1th.plus.com> wrote:
In message <4f9640eeeedhwild(a)talktalk.net> you wrote:
> In article <26693e964f.thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk>,
> Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > LloydsTSB have "upgraded" their site with the
result that When I log
> > in the summary account page just gives a blank page. I Fiddled with
> > the source and discovered that removing one line solved the problem.
> > I discussed this with the guys at Wakefield today and they couldn't
> > reproduce the fault. I have stripped the code down to a few lines:
> > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN">
> > <html>
> > <html lang="en">
> > <p> "test"</p>
> > </html>
Great, thank you Geoffrey. I can reproduce the problem.
Thanks for the test case!
> Should you have two <html ... > lines?
And what about the <head> and <body> tags? I was always led to believe
that they were mandatory, and that the head chunk had to have a
<title> subchunk.
Yes, the HTML is invalid, but this should not prevent NetSurf from
displaying the content. Plenty of invalid pages exist -- even high profile
sites like LloydsTSB -- so we have to support them.
Best regards,
--
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
8:56 a.m.
In article <26693e964f.thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk>,
Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
On my system this gives a blank page. If I remove either <html>
or the
next line it works.
Please can someone else try it to see if it behaves the same on
their
system before I create a bug report.
I have tried 1.2 and 2.0 r4108, both behave the same.
(I am using a Kinetic RISC PC with 4.39)
TTFN
I'm a LloydsTSB user and I have the same problems here, using Netsurf
*25th April 2008 15:00) r4108.
SARPC Select RO 6.06
I've also tried version 1.1 and a few others in between, no change.
Dave S
--
9:13 a.m.
On 27 Apr, dave(a)triffid.co.uk wrote:
In article <26693e964f.thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk>,
Geoffrey Baxendale <thebears(a)sarno.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> On my system this gives a blank page. If I remove either
<html> or the
> next line it works.
> Please can someone else try it to see if it behaves the same on
their
> system before I create a bug report.
> I have tried 1.2 and 2.0 r4108, both behave the same.
> (I am using a Kinetic RISC PC with 4.39)
> TTFN
I'm a LloydsTSB user and I have the same problems here, using
Netsurf
*25th April 2008 15:00) r4108.
SARPC Select RO 6.06
I've also tried version 1.1 and a few others in between, no
change.
Dave S
As a temp measure, it appears that both the versions of Oregano will
access the site okay(ish)... Well, good enough to get some work done.
Dave S
--
4564
days inactive
4565
days old
netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
5 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Dave Symes -
David H Wild -
Gavin Wraith -
Geoffrey Baxendale -
Michael Drake