7:07 a.m.
http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/
http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programmable...
Both display very badly. First site all text is hidden. The source is very
over-complicated, so I can't see why.
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!
7:39 a.m.
In message <5547fb845eLists(a)Torrens.org.uk>
"Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists(a)Torrens.org.uk> wrote:
http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programma
ble/479534?gclid=CImfsqu3x8oCFUORGwodHCUFYQ
Both display very badly. First site all text is hidden. The source is
very
over-complicated, so I can't see why.
Not related to the problem with the sites, but I confirm that the
feeders work very well. We have several cats with different dietary
requirements.
--
Grahame Parish
8:53 a.m.
In article <a777fe4755.GrahameParish(a)grahame.parish>,
Grahame Parish <maillist.parish(a)millers-way.net> wrote:
Not related to the problem with the sites, but I confirm that the
feeders work very well. We have several cats with different dietary
requirements.
Thanks - but any other discussion, off-list I think!
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!
7:49 a.m.
In message <5547fb845eLists(a)Torrens.org.uk>
"Richard Torrens (lists)" <Lists(a)Torrens.org.uk> wrote:
http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/
http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programmable...
Both display very badly. First site all text is hidden. The source is very
over-complicated, so I can't see why.
I have a useful little Lua script, called noscript, for use with StrongED that strips out
all the
stuff between matching <script ... > and </script> tags. Here it is:
#! lua
io.input (arg[1])
local text = io.read "*all"
io.input ( )
local pat = "<script[^<]*</script>"
io.write ((text:gsub (pat, "")))
Using it on the text of the first webpage produces source for a leaner webpage
that reveals the hidden text. Here is the procedure:
1. Page->View Source in NetSurf
2. Save to some scrap directory.
3. Shift-click to load into StrongED
4. Shift-Drag noscript to apply icon.
5. Save the result and change its type to HTML.
It would be nice if NetSurf could have an apply icon like StrongED, which
could make a single drag action suffice.
--
Gavin Wraith (gavin(a)wra1th.plus.com)
Home page: http://www.wra1th.plus.com/
9 a.m.
In article <145dff4755.gavin(a)wra1th.plus.com>,
Gavin Wraith <gavin(a)wra1th.plus.com> wrote:
I have a useful little Lua script, called noscript, for use with
StrongED that strips out all the stuff between matching <script ... >
and </script> tags. Here it is:
Useful: I have on occasion loked for the tags and deleted everything
between - it can be done with a StrongED search and replace. But the
script is easier.
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!
9:11 a.m.
Gavin Wraith wrote on 26 Jan:
Using it on the text of the first webpage produces source for a
leaner
webpage that reveals the hidden text. Here is the procedure:
1. Page->View Source in NetSurf
2. Save to some scrap directory.
3. Shift-click to load into StrongED
4. Shift-Drag noscript to apply icon.
5. Save the result and change its type to HTML.
Did that on the first web page. Got a security warning from StrongEd
about "process"; I said "allow always".
Then "File name '.in' not recognised".
Maybe my version of Lua is too old? !BOOT.Resources.!Lua.version says
5.70 (2013-08-16).
Potentially sounds like a very welcome utility.
Have often wished for a similar thing to override bothersome CSS,
particularly CSS that specifies tiny grey text (which seems to be a
current fashion among some designers with younger eyes than mine).
--
Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk
9:59 a.m.
In article <09d3064855.jim(a)abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel <netsurf(a)abbeypress.co.uk> wrote:
Have often wished for a similar thing to override bothersome CSS,
particularly CSS that specifies tiny grey text (which seems to be a
current fashion among some designers with younger eyes than mine).
... and what about the latest issue of Archive where, on page 3 you
have white text on a light ngrey background???
--
Chris Johnson
12:51 p.m.
New subject: / Archive 23:12 white-on-grey
cj wrote on 26 Jan:
... and what about the latest issue of Archive where, on page 3 you
have white text on a light grey background???
Yes; that was bad. The contrast looked fine in the past, and looked
fine this time too on screen, but unfortunately my printshop used a
new printer. Before next issue I'll ask him to put through a test
sheet with samples of the whole range of tints.
--
Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk
11:13 a.m.
In message <09d3064855.jim(a)abbeypress.net>
Jim Nagel <netsurf(a)abbeypress.co.uk> wrote:
Did that on the first web page. Got a security warning from StrongEd
about "process"; I said "allow always".
Then "File name '.in' not recognised".
Sounds like !StrongED$ScrapDir has not been set. See the line
Set StrongED$Script_Outfile <StrongED$ScrapDir>.in
in !StrongED.Defaults.Tools.!ScriptSED.Tools.Despatch .
--
Gavin Wraith (gavin(a)wra1th.plus.com)
Home page: http://www.wra1th.plus.com/
2688
days inactive
2688
days old
netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
8 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
cj -
Gavin Wraith -
Grahame Parish -
Jim Nagel -
Richard Torrens (lists)