10:33 p.m.
Hi,
http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
least #3784 on it seems.
Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
Has been confirmed by others.
--
Chris
11:03 p.m.
On 25 Nov 2016 Chris Newman <cvjazz(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
Hi,
Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From
at
least #3784 on it seems.
Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
Has been confirmed by others.
And I've put in a bug report.
http://bugs.netsurf-browser.org/mantis/view.php?id=2484
No response from the developers yet. I've also let Bernard know that
there's a problem with his website.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Ir) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung(a)ormail.co.uk
12:19 a.m.
In message <55e4bd72e6cvjazz(a)waitrose.com>
Chris Newman <cvjazz(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
Hi,
http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
least #3784 on it seems.
Behaviour changed between 3751 and 3777, which are the nearest two
versions I have downloaded (I was away from home while that range
was made available).
Dave
8:45 a.m.
Dave Higton, on 25 Nov, wrote:
In message <55e4bd72e6cvjazz(a)waitrose.com>
Chris Newman <cvjazz(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>
> Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
> least #3784 on it seems.
Behaviour changed between 3751 and 3777, which are the nearest two
versions I have downloaded (I was away from home while that range was made
available).
Something has tripped up OS4.42 and earlier, but all good on OS5.23.
I have uploaded a screen dump of the issue to the bug tracker.
--
David Pitt
9:49 a.m.
On 26 Nov 2016 David Pitt <pittdj(a)pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
Dave Higton, on 25 Nov, wrote:
> In message <55e4bd72e6cvjazz(a)waitrose.com>
> Chris Newman <cvjazz(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>>
>> Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
>> least #3784 on it seems.
>
> Behaviour changed between 3751 and 3777, which are the nearest two
> versions I have downloaded (I was away from home while that range was made
> available).
Something has tripped up OS4.42 and earlier, but all good on OS5.23.
I have uploaded a screen dump of the issue to the bug tracker.
Not good with *this* 5.23 :-( RComp version, 29-Jun-16
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Ir) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung(a)ormail.co.uk
12:13 p.m.
Peter Young, on 26 Nov, wrote:
On 26 Nov 2016 David Pitt <pittdj(a)pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
> Dave Higton, on 25 Nov, wrote:
> > In message <55e4bd72e6cvjazz(a)waitrose.com>
>> Chris Newman <cvjazz(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
>>
> > > Hi,
>>>
> > > http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>>>
> > > Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward.
> > > From at least #3784 on it seems.
>>
> > Behaviour changed between 3751 and 3777, which are the nearest two
> > versions I have downloaded (I was away from home while that range was
> > made available).
> Something has tripped up OS4.42 and earlier, but all good on OS5.23.
> I have uploaded a screen dump of the issue to the bug tracker.
Not good with *this* 5.23 :-( RComp version, 29-Jun-16
It is OK here with OS5.23 (06-Jun-16) on a Titanium.
OTOH it fails on the Iyonix with both 5.22 13-Apr-15 and 5.23 26-Nov-16.
!Fonts was the same on both the Iyonix and the Titanium.
--
David Pitt
12:22 p.m.
David Pitt, on 26 Nov, wrote:
Peter Young, on 26 Nov, wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2016 David Pitt <pittdj(a)pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Dave Higton, on 25 Nov, wrote:
>
> > > In message <55e4bd72e6cvjazz(a)waitrose.com>
> >> Chris Newman <cvjazz(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
> >>
> > > > Hi,
> >>>
> > > > http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
> >>>
> > > > Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward.
> > > > From at least #3784 on it seems.
> >>
> > > Behaviour changed between 3751 and 3777, which are the nearest two
> > > versions I have downloaded (I was away from home while that range
> > > was made available).
>
> > Something has tripped up OS4.42 and earlier, but all good on OS5.23.
>
> > I have uploaded a screen dump of the issue to the bug tracker.
>
> Not good with *this* 5.23 :-( RComp version, 29-Jun-16
It is OK here with OS5.23 (06-Jun-16) on a Titanium.
OTOH it fails on the Iyonix with both 5.22 13-Apr-15 and 5.23 26-Nov-16.
!Fonts was the same on both the Iyonix and the Titanium.
P.S. It is also good on the RPi3 OS5.23 12-Nov-16.
--
David Pitt
8:22 p.m.
In message <382bc7e455.DaveMeUK(a)my.inbox.com>
Dave Higton <dave(a)davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
In message <55e4bd72e6cvjazz(a)waitrose.com>
Chris Newman <cvjazz(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>
>Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
>least #3784 on it seems.
Behaviour changed between 3751 and 3777, which are the nearest two
versions I have downloaded (I was away from home while that range
was made available).
Specifically: it's OK in 3762 and faulty in 3763.
Dave
12:55 a.m.
On 25 Nov 2016 Chris Newman wrote:
Hi,
Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From
at
least #3784 on it seems.
Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
Has been confirmed by others.
OK on 3783 except that the background colour doesn't go all the way
down to the bottom.
--
Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
Skype: minijem2 mailto:ricp@minijem.plus.com
I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff that works.
1:57 a.m.
On 25 Nov 2016 as I do recall,
Chris Newman wrote:
http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
least #3784 on it seems.
What's it supposed to do that it doesn't?
(I just see a detailed description of how to set up a LanMan98 share.)
--
Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==
Let a fool hold his tongue and he will pass for a sage.
11:28 p.m.
On 26 Nov 2016 Harriet Bazley <lists(a)bazleyfamily.co.uk> wrote:
On 25 Nov 2016 as I do recall,
Chris Newman wrote:
> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>
> Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
> least #3784 on it seems.
>
What's it supposed to do that it doesn't?
(I just see a detailed description of how to set up a LanMan98
share.)
Yes, the problem was accessing Bernard's front page, not his
networking one. The front page was badly rendered, but in only some
versions of the OS. A work-round has been found, but the bug report is
still active.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Ir) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung(a)ormail.co.uk
10:56 p.m.
In message <55e4bd72e6cvjazz(a)waitrose.com>
Chris Newman <cvjazz(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
Hi,
http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
least #3784 on it seems.
Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
I've just discovered that NetSurf 3.6 was released on 2016 November 19
(8 days ago as I type this). It renders OK in 3.6 too.
Dave
1:35 p.m.
On 25 Nov 2016 Chris Newman <cvjazz(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
Hi,
Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From
at
least #3784 on it seems.
Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
Has been confirmed by others.
And has now been fixed in #3789. Thanks, Michael.
Best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter Young (zfc Ir) and family
Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52, England
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
pnyoung(a)ormail.co.uk
1430
days inactive
1434
days old
netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
12 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Chris Newman -
Dave Higton -
David Pitt -
Harriet Bazley -
Peter Young -
Richard Porter