> It's probably worth increasing the WimpSlot to > 2MB
Can something not be done about this because it is going to become a
in the long run..?
Err.... probably. It could be done most easily by compiling with
support for dynamic areas, but this would prevent it running on
anything less than RISC OS 3.5, - restricting Virtual Acorn people
Would it be possible to rewrite the malloc/calloc routines to use the
module area, or the wimp heap, or something?