8:51 p.m.
For the last 3 or 4 months, the Test Builds are behaving differently
with regard to the colour of text, when it is in a Frame.
To show you what I mean See:
http://wildflowerfinder.org.uk/
All the clickable text in the 1st and 2nd and 3rd columns is in the
wrong colour. It is displayed as bright blue, rather than dull purple.
To see what I mean, Try downloading JUST ONE page from the 1st column
and run that in Netsurf without it being in a frame.
You see what I mean.
It is a different colour when not in a frame.
With Netsurfs previous to about 4 months ago this problem did not
occur.
I cannot exclude the possibility that there is something wrong with my
code, but Netsurf certainly displays it differently when it's in a
frame than when it isn't.
Can anyone figure out why please?
If there's something wrong with my code, I'd like to get it sorted,
but I suspect there isn't and that it is Netsurf that is at fault. I
have duplicated the colours because different browsers ignore
different things, so I had to make it so all browsers display the same
colours. They did, until 4 months ago when the new Netsurfs stopped.
All other browsers I have tried it one behave normally.
--
Cheers
Roger
Never repeat a measurement if you want the same answer
10:06 p.m.
In article <21c0569050.rogerarm(a)rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington <rogerarm(a)freeuk.com> wrote:
For the last 3 or 4 months, the Test Builds are behaving differently
with regard to the colour of text, when it is in a Frame.
Please try r9460.
--
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
12:24 a.m.
On 26 Aug 2009, Michael Drake wrote:
In article <21c0569050.rogerarm(a)rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington <rogerarm(a)freeuk.com> wrote:
> For the last 3 or 4 months, the Test Builds are behaving differently
> with regard to the colour of text, when it is in a Frame.
Please try r9460.
Thanks for a very speedy response Michael.
But I'm not sure how to do that.
I can find something saying r9460, but the only thing I can seem to
download is a short 34kB text file seeming to be content/c.
And The [GO] button a bit further on doesn't seem to do anything.
I tried the latest test build but get a serious error before it gets
to the icon bar.
The error log file is surprisingly short, so short, I could put it
here as text:
desktop/netsurf.c netsurf_init 125: version '2.1 (23 May 2009)'
desktop/netsurf.c netsurf_init 132: NetSurf on <RISC OS>, node
<HOBBIT.FreeUK.com>, release <5.13>, version <1.0>, machine
<armv5l>
desktop/netsurf.c lib_init 190: xmlParserVersion 20628,
LIBXML_VERSION_STRING 20628
utils/filename.c filename_initialise 176: Temporary directory
location: <Wimp$ScrapDir>/WWW/NetSurf/Cache
content/urldb.c urldb_load 336: Loading URL file
content/urldb.c urldb_load 483: Successfully loaded URL file
rufl_init.c rufl_init 134: new font manager
rufl_init.c rufl_init 150: 301 faces, 61 families
rufl_init.c rufl_load_cache 1304: "Cut" not in font list
http_proxy:0
http_proxy_host:
http_proxy_port:8080
http_proxy_auth:0
http_proxy_auth_user:
http_proxy_auth_pass:
font_size:130
font_min_size:100
font_sans:Homerton
font_serif:Trinity
font_mono:Corpus
font_cursive:Homerton
font_fantasy:Sassoon
accept_language:en
accept_charset:
memory_cache_size:6815743
disc_cache_age:28
block_advertisements:1
minimum_gif_delay:10
send_referer:1
animate_images:1
expire_url:21
font_default:0
ca_bundle:NetSurf:Resources.ca-bundle
ca_path:
cookie_file:NetSurf:Cookies
cookie_jar:<Choices$Write>.WWW.NetSurf.Cookies
homepage_url:
url_suggestion:1
window_x:24
window_y:320
window_width:2454
window_height:1822
window_screen_width:3840
window_screen_height:2400
toolbar_status_size:5640
scale:100
incremental_reflow:1
min_reflow_period:100
max_fetchers:40
max_fetchers_per_host:10
max_cached_fetch_handles:6
suppress_curl_debug:1
target_blank:1
button_2_tab:1
margin_top:10
margin_bottom:10
margin_left:10
margin_right:10
export_scale:70
suppress_images:0
remove_backgrounds:0
enable_loosening:1
enable_PDF_compression:1
enable_PDF_password:0
use_mouse_gestures:0
allow_text_selection:1
theme:Qute
language:en
plot_fg_quality:128
plot_bg_quality:128
history_tooltip:1
toolbar_show_buttons:1
toolbar_show_address:1
toolbar_show_throbber:1
toolbar_browser:0123|548a6|79
toolbar_hotlist:401|23
toolbar_history:01|23
toolbar_cookies:0|12
window_stagger:0
window_size_clone:0
background_images:1
buffer_animations:1
buffer_everything:1
open_browser_at_startup:0
no_plugins:0
block_popups:1
image_memory_direct:-1
image_memory_compressed:-1
strip_extensions:0
confirm_overwrite:1
url_path:NetSurf:URL
url_save:<Choices$Write>.WWW.NetSurf.URL
hotlist_path:NetSurf:Hotlist
hotlist_save:<Choices$Write>.WWW.NetSurf.Hotlist
recent_path:NetSurf:Recent
recent_save:<Choices$Write>.WWW.NetSurf.Recent
theme_path:NetSurf:Themes
theme_save:<Choices$Write>.WWW.NetSurf.Themes
thumbnail_iconise:1
interactive_help:1
Fatal signal received: Segmentation fault
Stack backtrace:
Running thread 0x36f4c8
( 3aee8c) pc: 188c28 lr: 23e578 sp: 3aee90
__write_backtrace()
( 3aeed4) pc: 23e3ac lr: 8874 sp: 3aeed8 ^ro_gui_signal()
( 3aeefc) pc: 8864 lr: 211ae4 sp: 3aef00
__unixlib_exec_sig()
( 3aefa0) pc: 211498 lr: 35a868 sp: 3aefa4
__unixlib_raise_signal()
( 3aefb0) pc: 35a778 lr: 1ff004e4 sp: 3ad5a4 __h_cback()
Register dump at 003aefb4:
a1: 370940 a2: 1ff00833 a3: 6 a4: 1ff004e5
v1: 370940 v2: 357 v3: 6e51ca60 v4: 3a6a80
v5: 2b v6: 0 sl: 3ad210 fp: 3ad5bc
ip: 34f sp: 3ad5a4 lr: 1ff004e4 pc: 19360
cpsr: 40000010
0001934c : <... : 1a00003c : BNE &00019444
00019350 : .0ã : e3813001 : ORR R3,R1,#1
00019354 : .0å : e5803000 : STR R3,[R0,#0]
00019358 : ..à : e08c100e : ADD R1,R12,R14
0001935c : .0å : e59c3004 : LDR R3,[R12,#4]
00019360 : . å : e5912004 : LDR R2,[R1,#4]
00019364 : ...ã : e3130001 : TST R3,#1
00019368 : .`Âã : e3c26003 : BIC R6,R2,#3
0001936c : ,... : 0a00002c : BEQ &00019424
( 3ad5bc) pc: 1931c lr: 1a378 sp: 3ad5c0 free_unlocked()
( 3ad5d4) pc: 1a34c lr: 250ce4 sp: 3ad5d8 free()
( 3ad624) pc: 250730 lr: 275954 sp: 3ad628
^rufl_load_cache()
( 3adb74) pc: 2755a4 lr: 23ec84 sp: 3adb78 rufl_init()
( 3adc9c) pc: 23ebb4 lr: 175790 sp: 3adca0 nsfont_init()
( 3ade44) pc: 175280 lr: 2479e8 sp: 3ade48 gui_init()
( 3adfb8) pc: 247938 lr: 247bc0 sp: 3adfbc netsurf_init()
( 3adfc8) pc: 247bb4 lr: 247c24 sp: 3adfcc netsurf_main()
( 3adfe0) pc: 247be8 lr: cc7bc sp: 3adfe4 main()
( 3adff0) pc: cc79c lr: aef4 sp: 3adff4 _main()
--
Cheers
Roger
Lonely pen tops. Where are their pen pals?
12:30 a.m.
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 16:24 +0100, Roger Darlington wrote:
On 26 Aug 2009, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <21c0569050.rogerarm(a)rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
> Roger Darlington <rogerarm(a)freeuk.com> wrote:
>
>> For the last 3 or 4 months, the Test Builds are behaving differently
>> with regard to the colour of text, when it is in a Frame.
>
> Please try r9460.
>
Thanks for a very speedy response Michael.
But I'm not sure how to do that.
He means the latest test build.
I tried the latest test build but get a serious error before it gets
to the icon bar.
The error log file is surprisingly short, so short, I could put it
here as text:
desktop/netsurf.c netsurf_init 125: version '2.1 (23 May 2009)'
This isn't the latest test build.
John.
12:31 a.m.
In article <1425ee9050.rogerarm(a)rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington <rogerarm(a)freeuk.com> wrote:
>
> Please try r9460.
>
Thanks for a very speedy response Michael.
But I'm not sure how to do that.
I can find something saying r9460, but the only thing I can seem to
download is a short 34kB text file seeming to be content/c.
I get a working archive here - perhaps it was still incomplete earlier.
John
--
|| John Williams, N France || stuff at: http://petit.four.free.fr/
|| johnrw(a)ukgateway.net ||
|| Who is John Williams?: http://petit.four.free.fr/picindex/author/
12:41 a.m.
In article <1425ee9050.rogerarm(a)rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington <rogerarm(a)freeuk.com> wrote:
> Please try r9460.
But I'm not sure how to do that.
It's a revision number, referring to a development version. You can see
the revision number in the Info box from the iconbar menu in development
builds.
I meant try any development build of revision r9460 or greater, or "try
the latest build". :)
I tried the latest test build but get a serious error before it gets
to the icon bar.
From the log below, it looks like you got the latest release instead
of
the latest development build.
The error log file is surprisingly short, so short, I could put it
here as text:
desktop/netsurf.c netsurf_init 125: version '2.1 (23 May
2009)'
Version 2.1 is a release, not a development build.
--
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
2:21 a.m.
On 26 Aug 2009, Michael Drake wrote:
In article <1425ee9050.rogerarm(a)rogerarm.freeuk.com>,
Roger Darlington <rogerarm(a)freeuk.com> wrote:
> > Please try r9460.
> But I'm not sure how to do that.
It's a revision number, referring to a development version. You can see
the revision number in the Info box from the iconbar menu in development
builds.
I meant try any development build of revision r9460 or greater, or "try
the latest build". :)
> I tried the latest test build but get a serious error before it gets
> to the icon bar.
>From the log below, it looks like you got the latest release instead of
the latest development build.
> The error log file is surprisingly short, so short, I could put it
> here as text:
> desktop/netsurf.c netsurf_init 125: version '2.1 (23 May 2009)'
Version 2.1 is a release, not a development build.
Ooops, I thought I had downloaded the Test Build. I've done it
succesfully many times before, but must have downloaded the other by
mistake.
Now got r9460 and it works a treat :-)
Excellent!
--
Cheers
Roger
SHOUTING is a Capital offence
5145
days inactive
5146
days old
netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
John Williams (address) -
John-Mark Bell -
Michael Drake -
Roger Darlington