3:31 p.m.
The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability of
NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements.
It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
Here is a change log detailing the important changes in this release:
Core / All
----------
* Fetch improvements.
* Fix fetching from https sites with http authentication.
* Handle http authentication with no realm.
* Cookie handling improvements.
* Improved support for {min|max}-{width|height} CSS properties.
* HTML redraw optimisations.
* Improved mouse tracking over browser windows.
* Browser window status bar update rationalisation.
* Better handling of memory exhaustion.
* Made text export more robust.
* Fix relative positioning of floats.
* Align baselines of text on a line.
* HTML layout optimisations.
* Fixed HTML based box alignment behaviour.
* Sorted out default table borders.
* Updated Italian translation.
* Updated German translation.
* Allow any name for frame targets.
* Allow sending of referer when moving from http hosts to https.
* Improved stability.
* Simplified plotter API.
* Fixed memory leak in imagemap handler.
* Optimised debug rendering of box model outlines.
* Activity is indicated by 'progress' pointer.
* Ensure debug rendering outlines are plotted on top of other content.
* Now using LibCSS for CSS parsing and selection.
* Many CSS related bugs fixed.
* Rewritten cache and internal content handling.
* Fixes for file: URL handling.
* Don't try to access file: URLs through the configured proxy.
* Core widget for handling SELECT element menus.
* Core scrollbar widget used for CSS overflow and SELECT menu widget.
* Very basic quirks mode support.
* Cleaned up how the initial rendering of a content occurs.
* Command line argument handling and initialisation cleanup.
* Clearer build configuration messages.
* Favicon retrieval.
* Full page saves, including CSS and image files.
* PDF export disabled.
* Search-as-you-type page search support.
* Hubbub library (HTML parser):
+ Fixed locale problem.
+ Various improvements.
* LibCSS library (CSS parser and selection engine):
+ First release.
* LibNSBMP library (NetSurf BMP decoder):
+ Fix ICO decoding on big-endian platforms.
+ Improve inverse height calculation.
* LibNSGIF library (NetSurf GIF decoder):
+ Improve Palette entry handling.
* LibParserUtils library (parser building utility functions):
+ Fixed charset problem.
+ Various improvements.
* LibSVGTiny library (SVG support):
+ Colour component ordering fix.
+ Support arcs in paths.
+ Improve circle element handling.
+ Add ellipse element support.
+ Improve stroke width rounding.
* LibWapcaplet library (String internment):
+ First release.
RISC OS-specific
----------------
* Theme code cleanup.
* Fix possible HTTP autentication crash.
* Fix potential problem with URL completion.
* Better handling of WIMP errors.
* Fixed memory leak in path plotting. (Used for SVG display.)
* Improve launching of URIs NetSurf doesn't handle.
* New guide to building NetSurf on RISC OS.
* Simplified native build process for NetSurf and libraries.
* Multitasking behaviour changed to be kinder to other apps.
* Fixed problem loading content served locally from WebJames.
* Improved stability.
* Save complete now implemented in the core.
* Find text moved to core and crash bug fixed.
* RUfl library (RISC OS Unicode support):
+ Fixed font scan crash.
+ Faster font scanning with FontManager 3.64 or later.
GTK-specific
------------
* Give drawing area input focus on click.
* Added local history toolbar button.
* Improve dot and dash line patterns.
* Made throbber loading more robust.
* Improved tab handling.
* Improved status bar control.
* Faster plotting of clipped and scaled images for smooth scrolling.
* Favicon display.
* Added view source code feature.
* Added search box on toolbar.
* Theme handling.
* Toolbar customisation.
* Context sensitive menu updated.
* Improved menu structure.
* Updated for compatibility with latest GTK versions.
BeOS/Haiku-specific
-------------------
* Complete save support.
AmigaOS-specific
----------------
* Faster and more robust page plotting.
* Better clipping of plot actions.
* Smoother scrolling.
* Improved handling of tabs.
* Added UI for SSL certificate inspection.
* Improved stability.
* Better font handling.
* Added a preferences GUI.
* Better pointer handling.
* Better handling of bitmap alpha channels.
* Improved status bar.
* Added scale support.
* Improved mouse click handling.
* Keyboard shortcuts added.
* Added search bar.
* Added HelpHints.
* Theme and icon improvements.
* Handle more exotic formats dropped on text boxes, using DataTypes.
* Favicon display.
* Added search box on toolbar.
Framebuffer-specific
--------------------
* Framebuffer handling abstracted into libnsfb library.
* Fixed throbber to show inactivity correctly.
* Improved handling of text entry into URL bar.
* Fixed redraw issues while scrolled from top and while scrolling.
* Fixed redraw issues with animated GIFs and text areas.
* Improved mouse handling.
* Fixed zero size iframe crash.
* Added full range of pointer sprites.
* Better keyboard input handling.
* Fix continual reload on pages with meta refresh.
* Improve look and placement of toolbar, icons and scrollbars.
* Internal font changed. Includes more glyphs and bold/italic.
* Improved stability.
* LibNSFB library (NetSurf Framebuffer):
+ New library.
Windows-specific
----------------
* New front end, considered pre-alpha.
Also included are many smaller bug fixes, improvements and
documentation enhancements.
About NetSurf
=============
NetSurf is an Open Source web browser for RISC OS, Linux and other
Unix-like platforms, and AmigaOS 4. For further information, please see
the website at http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
The NetSurf Developers
--
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
4:10 p.m.
In message <510d269ff2tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake <tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate
availability of
NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements.
It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
The NetSurf Developers
Newly downloaded Such a bad omen!
The middle section cut out.
Michael Bell
--
5:57 p.m.
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
In message <510d269ff2tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake <tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability of
> NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements.
> It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
> The NetSurf Developers
Newly downloaded Such a bad omen!
The middle section cut out.
We cannot reproduce this, and the log file you provided contains
insufficient information to allow us to debug this successfully. Do you
still have the full log file? If so, please zip it and email it to me
(off list).
John.
1:17 a.m.
In message <1272149852.6726.1.camel@duiker>
John-Mark Bell <jmb(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
> In message <510d269ff2tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org>
> Michael Drake <tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>
>
>> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability of
>> NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements.
>
>> It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
>
>> The NetSurf Developers
>
> Newly downloaded Such a bad omen!
>
> The middle section cut out.
We cannot reproduce this, and the log file you provided contains
insufficient information to allow us to debug this successfully. Do you
still have the full log file? If so, please zip it and email it to me
(off list).
John.
Sorry, I have re-visited the sites which it tripped up on, and it
worked OK, so I can't do this.
Actually I am not a very competent RISC OS user, I am not sure I
correctly downloaded NetSurf and I am not sure how to zip file, I
never have to do it.
Do you want me to send in any further bug reports?
It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further. Maybe I
should have come to Wakefield.
Michael
--
1:52 a.m.
Michael Bell <michael(a)beaverbell.co.uk> wrote:
In message <1272149852.6726.1.camel@duiker>
John-Mark Bell <jmb(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
> > In message <510d269ff2tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org>
>> Michael Drake <tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>>
>>
> > > The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate
> > > availability of NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes
> > > and improvements.
>>
> > > It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
[snip - incomplete log]
> We cannot reproduce this, and the log file you provided
contains
> insufficient information to allow us to debug this successfully. Do you
> still have the full log file? If so, please zip it and email it to me
> (off list).
Sorry, I have re-visited the sites which it tripped up on, and it
worked
OK, so I can't do this.
Actually I am not a very competent RISC OS user, I am not sure I correctly
downloaded NetSurf and I am not sure how to zip file, I never have to do
it.
Is SparkFS on the machine? If not there are alternatives which can be talked
through.
Do you want me to send in any further bug reports?
I could not reproduce the crash here, but something tripped up NetSurf and
that is of interest to the developers, if something can happen it will
happen - again.
The original full log does need to have been preserved, if it has been
overwritten then the evidence is lost.
It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further.
Maybe I
should have come to Wakefield.
The NetSurf developers have done a very good job with version 2.50, if this
is the end of the road due to lack of RISC OS developers then 2.50 is a
reasonably good place to be.
--
David Pitt
2:32 a.m.
In message <mpro.l1f73g00000yz00i3.pittdj(a)pittdj.co.uk>
David Pitt <pittdj(a)pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
Michael Bell <michael(a)beaverbell.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <1272149852.6726.1.camel@duiker>
> John-Mark Bell <jmb(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
The NetSurf developers have done a very good job with version 2.50,
if this
is the end of the road due to lack of RISC OS developers then 2.50 is a
reasonably good place to be.
It is a big step further and with JavaScript it would be even more
delightful.
Thanks to all the guys who have worked on the project.
Cheers
Alan
--
3:18 a.m.
In message <mpro.l1f73g00000yz00i3.pittdj(a)pittdj.co.uk>
David Pitt <pittdj(a)pittdj.co.uk> wrote:
Michael Bell <michael(a)beaverbell.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <1272149852.6726.1.camel@duiker>
> John-Mark Bell <jmb(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
>>> In message <510d269ff2tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org>
>>> Michael Drake <tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate
>>>> availability of NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes
>>>> and improvements.
>>>
>>>> It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
[snip - incomplete log]
>> We cannot reproduce this, and the log file you provided
contains
>> insufficient information to allow us to debug this successfully. Do you
>> still have the full log file? If so, please zip it and email it to me
>> (off list).
> Sorry, I have re-visited the sites which it tripped up on, and it
worked
> OK, so I can't do this.
>
> Actually I am not a very competent RISC OS user, I am not sure I correctly
> downloaded NetSurf and I am not sure how to zip file, I never have to do
> it.
Is SparkFS on the machine? If not there are alternatives which can be
talked
through.
> Do you want me to send in any further bug reports?
I could not reproduce the crash here, but something tripped up
NetSurf and
that is of interest to the developers, if something can happen it will
happen - again.
The original full log does need to have been preserved, if it has
been
overwritten then the evidence is lost.
> It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed
further. Maybe I
> should have come to Wakefield.
The NetSurf developers have done a very good job with version 2.50,
if this
is the end of the road due to lack of RISC OS developers then 2.50 is a
reasonably good place to be.
Now I think about it, I have got SparkFS on my machine, so I could
used that. The original log has been lost.
Michael Bell
--
3:41 a.m.
On 25 Apr 2010 Michael Bell <michael(a)beaverbell.co.uk> wrote:
[snip]
It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further.
Maybe I
should have come to Wakefield.
Not so, I think. Since 2.5 came out there have been several updates on
the test builds page, at least one of which is RISC OS-specific.
With best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter, \ / zfc Yb \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52
Anne \/ __ __ \ England.
and / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
family / \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \______________ pnyoung(a)ormail.co.uk
5:01 a.m.
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:41:26 +0100
Dr Peter Young <pnyoung(a)ormail.co.uk> wrote:
> It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed
further.
> Maybe I should have come to Wakefield.
Not so, I think. Since 2.5 came out there have been several updates
on the test builds page, at least one of which is RISC OS-specific
Holding a door open for somebody does not mean you've agreed to become
their valet :)
Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt. It
may continue to be developed, it may not.
B.
10:06 a.m.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:46:32 GMT
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in
doubt.
> It may continue to be developed, it may not.
Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report bugs?
Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RISC OS front end may
still continue to be supported, or it may not. And if it does stop
being supported, I suspect it won't simply vanish.
B.
11:24 a.m.
On 26 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:46:32 GMT
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt.
> > It may continue to be developed, it may not.
>
> Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report
> bugs?
Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RISC OS front end may still
continue to be supported, or it may not. And if it does stop being
supported, I suspect it won't simply vanish.
If development of the RISC OS front end were to cease - please not! -
would RISC OS builds continue to be available and, if so, would they
reflect changes not related to the RISC OS front end?
Tony
11:28 a.m.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:24:33 GMT
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RISC OS front end
may
> still continue to be supported, or it may not. And if it does stop
> being supported, I suspect it won't simply vanish.
If development of the RISC OS front end were to cease - please not! -
would RISC OS builds continue to be available and, if so, would they
reflect changes not related to the RISC OS front end?
If we can find nobody to commit to maintaining the RISC OS front end,
changes in the core will eventually break the RISC OS front end, and
stop it building at all. Existing releases and working source code
will continue to be available from our website.
The changes to the core that we are trying to do actually reduce the
complexity of the RISC OS front end, making it easier to maintain, but
somebody needs to make changes to reflect them.
B.
11:37 a.m.
On 26 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:24:33 GMT
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RISC OS front end may
> > still continue to be supported, or it may not. And if it does stop
> > being supported, I suspect it won't simply vanish.
>
> If development of the RISC OS front end were to cease - please not! -
> would RISC OS builds continue to be available and, if so, would they
> reflect changes not related to the RISC OS front end?
If we can find nobody to commit to maintaining the RISC OS front end,
changes in the core will eventually break the RISC OS front end, and
stop it building at all. Existing releases and working source code
will continue to be available from our website.
Thank's for the explanation.
The changes to the core that we are trying to do actually reduce the
complexity of the RISC OS front end, making it easier to maintain, but
somebody needs to make changes to reflect them.
I would like to help but, alas, I'm not a programmer.
Tony
12:21 p.m.
In message <20100426172843.6ed61c0e(a)trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
If we can find nobody to commit to maintaining the RISC OS front end,
changes in the core will eventually break the RISC OS front end, and
stop it building at all. Existing releases and working source code
will continue to be available from our website.
The changes to the core that we are trying to do actually reduce the
complexity of the RISC OS front end, making it easier to maintain, but
somebody needs to make changes to reflect them.
How easy would the RISC OS front end be to maintain.
I'm not bad at BASIC know a bit of PHP, so may be able to get to grips
if not to complicated.
I'm willing to give it a go and at first be a bit of a pain to the real
developers until or if I get my head around what needs doing.
--
Kev Wells http://riscos.kevsoft.co.uk/
http://kevsoft.co.uk/ http://kevsoft.co.uk/AleQuest/
ICQ 238580561
When all else fails twat it with a hammer.
1:22 p.m.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:21:53 +0100
Kevin Wells <kevinwells(a)talktalk.net> wrote:
How easy would the RISC OS front end be to maintain.
I'm not bad at BASIC know a bit of PHP, so may be able to get to grips
if not to complicated.
If you don't already have experience and knowledge of C, it's very very
complicated.
B.
4:26 p.m.
On 26 Apr, Rob Kendrick wrote in message
<20100426192242.34a3d212(a)trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:21:53 +0100 Kevin Wells
<kevinwells(a)talktalk.net>
wrote:
> How easy would the RISC OS front end be to maintain.
>
> I'm not bad at BASIC know a bit of PHP, so may be able to get to grips
> if not to complicated.
If you don't already have experience and knowledge of C, it's very very
complicated.
And even if you do have said experience, it probably isn't a five-minute
thing to pick up (at least to the level required to fix the Core Treeview
problems). You might want to add to the requirements some familiarity with
OSLib and of writing Wimp applications without the help of the toolbox, too.
That said: if anyone is reading this with the necessary experience, and
wants to help, I'll try and share what little knowledge I've accumulated of
the RISC OS frontend over the past few months. I'm not offering to teach C,
OSLib or the use of the Wimp to anyone, however. :-)
I've put up a list (which is almost certainly incomplete) of things still to
do to make the RISC OS front-end compatible with the Core Treeview branch on
the development Wiki, at
http://wiki.netsurf-browser.org/Todo/RISC_OS_frontend
If anyone can help, get in touch via the netsurf-dev mailing list. That way
we can make sure that we don't end up doing the same things twice, and I can
also try and explain how I envisaged the remaining bits slotting together
(although better ideas would be welcomed :-).
--
Steve Fryatt - Leeds, England
http://www.stevefryatt.org.uk/
10:16 a.m.
New subject: How to zip a failure log?
In message <27c20e0e51.old_coaster(a)old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 25 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
[snip]
> Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt.
It
> may continue to be developed, it may not.
Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report
bugs?
Tony
Netsurf has failed and I have the log. I have Spark 2.28, but I have
forgotten how to use it.
Michael Bell
--
10:23 a.m.
New subject: How to zip a failure log?
On 28 Apr 2010, Michael Bell <michael(a)beaverbell.co.uk> wrote:
In message <27c20e0e51.old_coaster(a)old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 25 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> [snip]
> > Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt.
> > It may continue to be developed, it may not.
> Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report
> bugs?
> Tony
Netsurf has failed and I have the log. I have Spark 2.28, but I have
forgotten how to use it.
I don't use SparkFS, so maybe someone else can help.
Tony
10:30 a.m.
New subject: How to zip a failure log?
In article <acd9190f51.old_coaster(a)old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>,
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
I don't use SparkFS, so maybe someone else can help.
I do use it, but this is Spark, not SparkFS, from
http://www.davidpilling.net/riscos.html
Unfortunately the download from there doesn't work, and Sparkplug fails to
download with NetSurf 2.5 with an error from Iconv.
I was trying to get this stuff to help - but can't!
John
11:22 a.m.
New subject: How to zip a failure log?
John Williams <JohnRW(a)ukgateway.net> wrote:
In article <acd9190f51.old_coaster(a)old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>,
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I don't use SparkFS, so maybe someone else can help.
I do use it, but this is Spark, not SparkFS, from
http://www.davidpilling.net/riscos.html
Unfortunately the download from there doesn't work, and Sparkplug fails to
download with NetSurf 2.5 with an error from Iconv.
Confirming the Sparkplug download problem, "riscos/gui.c warn_user 2374:
IconvFailed Invalid multibyte sequence (null)".
Spark is a paid for job, the 2.28 Spark download is just an upgrade.
Spark can archive in what it calls "PC format", whether that is the same as
zip or not is another matter.
I was trying to get this stuff to help - but can't!
That makes two of us.
As someone has already said - InfoZip.
--
David Pitt
10:38 a.m.
New subject: How to zip a failure log?
In message <d031190f51.michaelbell(a)michael.beaverbell.co.uk>
Michael Bell <michael(a)beaverbell.co.uk> wrote:
--
Kev Wells http://riscos.kevsoft.co.uk/
http://kevsoft.co.uk/ http://kevsoft.co.uk/AleQuest/
ICQ 238580561
IF your nose runs and your feet smell it means your upside down.
In message <27c20e0e51.old_coaster(a)old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 25 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> [snip]
>> Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt. It
>> may continue to be developed, it may not.
> Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report bugs?
> Tony
Netsurf has failed and I have the log. I have Spark 2.28, but I have
forgotten how to use it.
Michael Bell
I use Infozip for all my zipping.
<http://www.starfighter.acornarcade.com/mysite/utilities.htm#infozip>
Which is a simple matter of dropping the file you want zipped on the
Infozip icon on the iconbar.
10:54 a.m.
New subject: How to zip a failure log?
On 28 Apr 2010 Michael Bell wrote:
In message <27c20e0e51.old_coaster(a)old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore <old_coaster(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 25 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org>
wrote:
> [snip]
>> Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in
doubt. It
>> may continue to be developed, it may not.
> Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report
bugs?
> Tony
Netsurf has failed and I have the log. I have Spark 2.28, but I have
forgotten how to use it.
You need David Pilling's SparkFS. Just click on the iconbar icon, edit
the filename as required and drag the zip icon to where you want to
save it. A directory window will then open, allowing you to drag files
into it. You can't rename objects inside an archive directory.
Make sure the resulting archive isn't over 256kB or Sourceforge won't
accept it. If necessary split the log file up (by selective saving
from your favourite editor).
--
Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
mailto:ricp@minijem.plus.com
Confidentiality statement: Imagine 50 lines of pointless verbiage.
4:39 p.m.
In article <510d269ff2tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org>, Michael Drake
<tlsa(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate
availability
of NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements.
[Snip]
And I'm happy to be using it as my default browser here.
--
_____________________________________________________________________
Brian Jordan
Virtual RPC-AdjustSA
RISC OS 6.20
_____________________________________________________________________
3:10 a.m.
New subject: A crash
Using Netsurf 16 May 2010 r10552 as the first task of a session (so,
nothing else in the computer) I found the YHA's own site and it
"detected a serious error" and I got the attached error log which I
now know how to ZIP.
Is this report in the correct form?
Michael Bell
--
3:48 a.m.
New subject: A crash
On 16 Jun 2010 Michael Bell wrote:
Using Netsurf 16 May 2010 r10552 as the first task of a session (so,
nothing else in the computer) I found the YHA's own site and it
"detected a serious error" and I got the attached error log which I
now know how to ZIP.
Is this report in the correct form?
Yes, but upload it to the bug tracker - don't post it here!
--
Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
mailto:ricp@minijem.plus.com
Confidentiality statement: Imagine 50 lines of pointless verbiage.
4666
days inactive
4719
days old
netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
26 comments
13 participants
participants (13)
-
Brian Jordan -
David Pitt -
Dr Alan Leighton -
Dr Peter Young -
John Williams -
John-Mark Bell -
Kevin Wells -
Michael Bell -
Michael Drake -
Richard Porter -
Rob Kendrick -
Steve Fryatt -
Tony Moore