On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:01 +0200, jeroen_palm(a)mac.com wrote: While it may be possible to challenge part of this filing based on prior art in NetSurf, Apple have put a lot more functionality into their patent description that NS's history window currently has. I doubt we could stop this going through. OTOH, I doubt Apple will attempt to stop NetSurf from adding such features should our userbase demand them. D. -- Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 2BC8 4016 2068 7895

Well, I've just had a reply from the US patents office.... <quote> Protests by a member of the public against pending applications will be referred to the examiner having charge of the subject matter involved. A protest specifically identifying the application to which the protest is directed will be entered in the application file if: (1) The protest is submitted prior to the mailing of a notice of allowance under rule 1.311; and (2) The protest is either served upon the applicant in accordance with rule 1.248, or filed with the Office in duplicate in the event service is not possible. For more detailed information on protesting a patent, you may visit our Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/main/patents.htm for the Manual of Patent Examining Procedures (MPEP). If you have any further questions or if you require additional information, please call the USPTO Contact Center at 1-800-786-9199 or (571) 272-1000 and reference the following Service Request number: 1-132889024 </quote> -- Using, programming and promoting RISC OS - the most productive computer system in the world. Check it out now, and change your view of computers!! To reply/email, visit http://www.riscos.org/feedback/ I don't have an attitude problem, you have a perception problem.