3:20 p.m.
I've previously reported that I've experienced problems at boot with
!Cache on my ARMini (RO5.20). I've therefore installed it in
Utilities.Caution and have got a work-round that stops the problems.
I've just downloaded NetSurf build #2123 dated 25 Sep. The copy of
!Cache in the !Boot.Resources directory has a date stamp of 16 Sep
2014. It appears to be identical to the version I have installed
dated 09 June 2014.
I will be happy to install an updated version of !Cache, especially if
the problem I have happens to be solved. In the meantime I would
appreciate it if the datestamps could be preserved so it doesn't
appear to be updated.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
8:24 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:20:56AM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
I will be happy to install an updated version of !Cache, especially
if
the problem I have happens to be solved. In the meantime I would
appreciate it if the datestamps could be preserved so it doesn't
appear to be updated.
Sadly this is an unavoidable artifact of the version control system we
use. Each development build has with it a list of changes that can be
viewed using the Jenkins interface, however.
B.
8:46 p.m.
Rob Kendrick wrote on 26 Sep:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:20:56AM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
> I will be happy to install an updated version of !Cache, especially if
> the problem I have happens to be solved. In the meantime I would
> appreciate it if the datestamps could be preserved so it doesn't
> appear to be updated.
Sadly this is an unavoidable artifact of the version control system
we
use. Each development build has with it a list of changes that can be
viewed using the Jenkins interface, however.
Please explain "Jenkins interface" and how to get to it. This is a
new term on me. Just me? (Mein Unwissendheit entschuldigen, bitte.)
--
Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk
|| See you at the show? www.riscoslondonshow.co.uk Oct 25
10 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:46:56PM +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
Rob Kendrick wrote on 26 Sep:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:20:56AM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>> I will be happy to install an updated version of !Cache, especially if
>> the problem I have happens to be solved. In the meantime I would
>> appreciate it if the datestamps could be preserved so it doesn't
>> appear to be updated.
> Sadly this is an unavoidable artifact of the version control system we
> use. Each development build has with it a list of changes that can be
> viewed using the Jenkins interface, however.
Please explain "Jenkins interface" and how to get to it. This is a
new term on me. Just me? (Mein Unwissendheit entschuldigen, bitte.)
It is linked to off http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/ - beware that it is
for advanced users only. These are development builds, after all.
B.
2:45 a.m.
In message <20140926130057.GI20162(a)platypus.pepperfish.net>
on 26 Sep 2014 Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:46:56PM +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
> Rob Kendrick wrote on 26 Sep:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:20:56AM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>>> I will be happy to install an updated version of !Cache, especially if
>>> the problem I have happens to be solved. In the meantime I would
>>> appreciate it if the datestamps could be preserved so it doesn't
>>> appear to be updated.
>
>> Sadly this is an unavoidable artifact of the version control system we
>> use. Each development build has with it a list of changes that can be
>> viewed using the Jenkins interface, however.
>
> Please explain "Jenkins interface" and how to get to it. This is a
> new term on me. Just me? (Mein Unwissendheit entschuldigen, bitte.)
It is linked to off http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/ - beware that it
is
for advanced users only. These are development builds, after all.
Fair enough, and thanks for the link and explanation. However, I
still don't understand why the date stamps are updated only
intermittently,
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
3:18 a.m.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 06:45:25PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
Fair enough, and thanks for the link and explanation. However, I
still don't understand why the date stamps are updated only
intermittently,
Because the resources come as part of our compiler toolchain, and we
don't rebuild that very often. (It's rarely changed.)
B.
3283
days inactive
3283
days old
netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrew Pinder -
Jim Nagel -
Rob Kendrick