On 28 Feb 2008 John-Mark Bell <jmb(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:57:32 GMT, Dr Peter Young
<pnyoung(a)ormail.co.uk>
wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2008 Paul Vigay <lists-nospam(a)vigay.com> wrote:
>
>> In a dim and distant universe <4f77e542d4riscos(a)gotadsl.co.uk>,
>> Richard Ashbery <riscos(a)gotadsl.co.uk> enlightened us thusly:
>>> Brilliant it now works - well, on some sites anyway.
>
>> Is this the ink jet driver, or postscript? I presume PostScript is still
>> broken, as I can't seem to get it to work here.
>
> Nor here with PostScript.
Of course not; noone's made any claims that PDriverPS has been
fixed. I'm
somewhat confused, therefore, as to the state of bafflement that exists
here.
> Is there any prospect of this PostScript problem being sorted
out?
Not be me at least -- it was bad enough fixing PDriverDP without
direct
access to either a printer or, perhaps more usefully, a RISC OS machine. I
don't have time to wade through the thousands of pages of PostScript
language specification to work out what's required. This effort would be
most certainly wasted, anyway, as people who are already experts in dealing
with PostScript are working on improving PostScript printing.
Many thanks for this clarification, and I'll wait patiently for the
results of the other experts. You are one yourself, of course, and
your efforts are greatly appreciated by us trogs.
With best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter \ / \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52
Anne \ / __ __ \ England.
and / / \ | | |\ | / _ \
http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
family / \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \______________ pnyoung(a)ormail.co.uk.