3:42 p.m.
when the results of a Google search include a PDF, Google offers to
display it as plain text. but it comes out as nonsense in Netsurf
(r9629): all the lines of text seem to be piled on top of one another.
at least in this example:
http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:dr7rk6-FAmcJ:www.mendip.gov.uk/Downl...
--
Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk
3:55 p.m.
In message <a61a1dba50.jim(a)nails.ukonline.co.uk>
Jim Nagel <netsurf(a)abbeypress.co.uk> wrote:
when the results of a Google search include a PDF, Google offers to
display it as plain text. but it comes out as nonsense in Netsurf
(r9629): all the lines of text seem to be piled on top of one another.
at least in this example:
http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:dr7rk6-FAmcJ:www.mendip.gov.uk/Do
wnload.asp%3Fpath%3D%252FDocuments%252FRegeneration%252Fcar%2Bparks%25
2FGlastonbury%2BCarnival%2BRoad%2BClosure%2BOrder%2B2009.pdf+Glastonbu
ry+carnival+traffic&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&
Yes, it's always done that.
Michael Bell
--
4:06 p.m.
In message <a61a1dba50.jim(a)nails.ukonline.co.uk>
Jim Nagel <netsurf(a)abbeypress.co.uk> wrote:
when the results of a Google search include a PDF, Google offers to
display it as plain text. but it comes out as nonsense in Netsurf
(r9629): all the lines of text seem to be piled on top of one another.
at least in this example:
http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:dr7rk6-FAmcJ:www.mendip.gov.uk/Downl...
Is the original pdf just an image file served up as a pdf?
As pdf's from the http://whatdotheyknow.com site viewed as html work
fine if they are not purely image files, as these two examples show.
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/3567/response/8806/attach/html/3/im...
Failed.
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/19334/response/54789/attach/html/3/...
Works.
--
Kev Wells http://riscos.kevsoft.co.uk/
http://kevsoft.co.uk/ http://kevsoft.co.uk/AleQuest/
ICQ 238580561
Feeling stupid I know I am.
4:35 p.m.
In article <a61a1dba50.jim(a)nails.ukonline.co.uk>,
Jim Nagel <netsurf(a)abbeypress.co.uk> wrote:
when the results of a Google search include a PDF, Google offers to
display it as plain text. but it comes out as nonsense in Netsurf
(r9629): all the lines of text seem to be piled on top of one another.
at least in this example:
True, but if you SHIFT-click on the link displayed above the
nonsense, the pdf file downloads and can be read in e.g. !PDF without
any problem.
--
Chris Johnson
6:09 p.m.
In message <50ba21fe2achris(a)chris-johnson.org.uk>
cj <chris(a)chris-johnson.org.uk> wrote:
In article <a61a1dba50.jim(a)nails.ukonline.co.uk>,
Jim Nagel <netsurf(a)abbeypress.co.uk> wrote:
> when the results of a Google search include a PDF, Google offers to
> display it as plain text. but it comes out as nonsense in Netsurf
> (r9629): all the lines of text seem to be piled on top of one another.
> at least in this example:
>
http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:dr7rk6-FAmcJ:www.mendip.gov.uk/Do
> wnload.asp%3Fpath%3D%252FDocuments%252FRegeneration%252Fcar%2Bparks%25
> 2FGlastonbury%2BCarnival%2BRoad%2BClosure%2BOrder%2B2009.pdf+Glastonbu
> ry+carnival+traffic&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&
True, but if you SHIFT-click on the link displayed above the
nonsense, the pdf file downloads and can be read in e.g. !PDF without
any problem.
I didn't know that. Thank you!
Michael Bell
--
7 p.m.
In message <a6982aba50.michaelbell(a)michael.beaverbell.co.uk> you wrote:
In message <50ba21fe2achris(a)chris-johnson.org.uk>
cj <chris(a)chris-johnson.org.uk> wrote:
> In article <a61a1dba50.jim(a)nails.ukonline.co.uk>,
> Jim Nagel <netsurf(a)abbeypress.co.uk> wrote:
>> when the results of a Google search include a PDF, Google offers to
>> display it as plain text. but it comes out as nonsense in Netsurf
>> (r9629): all the lines of text seem to be piled on top of one another.
>> at least in this example:
>> http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:dr7rk6-FAmcJ:www.mendip.gov.uk/Do
>> wnload.asp%3Fpath%3D%252FDocuments%252FRegeneration%252Fcar%2Bparks%25
>> 2FGlastonbury%2BCarnival%2BRoad%2BClosure%2BOrder%2B2009.pdf+Glastonbu
>> ry+carnival+traffic&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&
> True, but if you SHIFT-click on the link displayed above the
> nonsense, the pdf file downloads and can be read in e.g. !PDF without
> any problem.
I didn't know that. Thank you!
Michael Bell
I'm puzzeled. whent I click on that link I don't get any 'piling'
(Netsurf 2.1) and clicking the link at the top of the page
(not SHIFT-click) downloads the PDF.
But I see with r9640 (26 Aug 2009 11:30) I do get the 'piling'
but still do not need to SHIFT-click to get the PDF.
--
Erving
7:09 p.m.
In article <54392fba50.Erving(a)orpheusnet.co.uk>,
Erving <erving(a)riscos.org> wrote:
I'm puzzeled. whent I click on that link I don't get any
'piling'
(Netsurf 2.1) and clicking the link at the top of the page
(not SHIFT-click) downloads the PDF.
But I see with r9640 (26 Aug 2009 11:30) I do get the 'piling'
but still do not need to SHIFT-click to get the PDF.
Ditto - it's obviously a problem with the recent development versions.
--
Chris Johnson
12:03 a.m.
In article <50ba30204achris(a)chris-johnson.org.uk>,
cj <chris(a)chris-johnson.org.uk> wrote:
In article <54392fba50.Erving(a)orpheusnet.co.uk>,
Erving <erving(a)riscos.org> wrote:
> I'm puzzeled. whent I click on that link I don't get any 'piling'
> (Netsurf 2.1) and clicking the link at the top of the page
> (not SHIFT-click) downloads the PDF.
> But I see with r9640 (26 Aug 2009 11:30) I do get the 'piling'
> but still do not need to SHIFT-click to get the PDF.
Ditto - it's obviously a problem with the recent development
versions.
Also no problem with r8643 (21 Jul 2009) which was the last build before the
memory grabbing problems started.
--
Chris
3:34 p.m.
4002
days inactive
4003
days old
netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
9 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Chris Newman -
cj -
Erving -
Jim Nagel -
John-Mark Bell -
Kevin Wells -
Michael Bell