On 11 Feb 2011 Michael Drake wrote:
In article <564212a451.ricp(a)user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter <ricp(a)minijem.plus.com> wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2011 Michael Drake wrote:
>> Out of interest, what speed do you get if you set
>> to "0" in the Choices file? If your test pages have changed, please
>> test again with the original settings first.
> Wow! 8s and 6s respectively - infinitely better on all counts!
> Incremental reflow might enable you to see some images before
> whole lot are downloaded but it isn't worth the candle unless you're
> running on really fast hardware.
I'm not sure there isn't something strange happening on your
I hope not, but the Iyonix should be a bit faster than a RiscPC with a
Vpod (1280x1024, 16M colours if it matters).
On my system (an Iyonix), your url loads with incremental reflow
enabled in less than 4s.
Try the other test. Go to http://www.minimarcos.org.uk/galleries.html
and click on the link "Mk.VI". This takes you to the bottom of a
largish thumbnail index. It was taking a lot of time to reformat the
table, redraw the page and then reposition it to the on-page name tag
every few images.
Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff that works.