On 21 Apr 2013 Rob Kendrick wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
> I don't think there's anything I can do other than that. I was
> wondering whether there's a design reason why NS doesn't keep a copy
> of the resized image in its cache, which would save a lot of
> processing time in such circumstances.
Choices -> Cache -> Enter suitably large number. Shoving 40MB
makes the page scroll smoothly where with the default value it did not.
I've tried 40MB but it doesn't make any difference. I did quit and
restart NS in case that mattered, but as soon as I hit the large image
files it was like scrolling through treacle.
Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff that works.