On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:11:02 +0100
Paul Vigay <lists-nospam(a)vigay.com> wrote:
> Why not use a frame instead? For embedding HTML content,
they're
> conceptually identical in so far as their annoyances and flaws.
I didn't really want to use frames due to having to recode the rest
of the page, especially as I've made extensive use of SSIs which
would mean I'd have to do that page differently to all the others.
How is this different from using <object> ?
> I lost interest when attempting to wget this results in a 403.
That's because it's not a live site yet and is currently running from
my test server, which blocks attempts to grab development code off
it. :-)
You won't get any precise input from me, then :) Although I could just
tell wget via command line parameters to use a different user agent
(as anybody else would who wanted to grab your development code), it's
not worth the 5 seconds of my time it would take! :-)
B.