Re: Bug "Out of date"
On 8 Mar 2011 "David J. Ruck" <druck(a)druck.org.uk> wrote:
On 08/03/2011 08:38, John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 08:30 +0000, David J. Ruck wrote:
>> What is the reasoning behind marking a bug "out of date"? Particularly
>> when it is easily reproducible with the last test build by one click on
>> the given URL.
>
> Simple: it was 4 years old and I couldn't reproduce it (and still can't
> fwiw)
Well maybe someone else can.
Yes, does exactly what druck describes here; r11927 and RISC OS 5.16.
Gobbles up the memory, too.
With best wishes,
Peter.
--
Peter \ / zfc Lu \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52
and \/ __ __ \ England.
family / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk
/ \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \______________ pnyoung(a)ormail.co.uk