In article <20090427203901.5f7f628a(a)trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>,
Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:58:41 +0100
Jim Nagel <netsurf(a)abbeypress.co.uk> wrote:
> within the Netsurf 2.0 zipfile download, the datestamps on all
> internal files have been lost -- everything is stamped 2009-04-22
> 16:42 (give or take a few seconds).
> is that on purpose or a glitch?
It is a side effect of how the autobuilder in release mode works, if
recall. There is nothing to fear, and you certainly shouldn't use
dates to calculate merging; you should always use a whole NetSurf as
you have obtained it.
Bob, is it also recommended to install all the files that come with a
recent build, as you would with a new version. The former I've not
usually done, as I seem to remember someone saying it was not required
with builds to a version.
Thanks to all involved with the new version.
There is one odditly thats been in place since around the version one
introduction, where it wont resolve some pages, reporting 'The document
sent by the server is empty' (i've posted JMB direct on this with logs).