Re: datestamps
On 28 Apr 2009 Phil wrote:
In article
<20090427203901.5f7f628a(a)trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>,
Rob Kendrick <rjek(a)netsurf-browser.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:58:41 +0100
> Jim Nagel <netsurf(a)abbeypress.co.uk> wrote:
>> within the Netsurf 2.0 zipfile download, the datestamps on
all the
>> internal files have been lost -- everything is stamped 2009-04-22
>> 16:42 (give or take a few seconds).
>>
>> is that on purpose or a glitch?
> It is a side effect of how the autobuilder in release mode works,
...
> B.
Bob, is it also recommended to install all the files that come with
a
recent build, as you would with a new version. ...
Yes, but you don't need to do the !Boot and !System updates every
time. I work on the basis that if an updated module is required it
will be RMEnsured in the !Run file.
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_ mailto:ricp@minijem.plus.com
Disclaimer: Please imagine about 50 lines of pointless clutter.