> Not my problem. It was commercial, thus drawing my attention to
Would there be any point in telling a suit that he's sending out
formats he /perhaps/ shouldn't? Only if you can tell him he's losing
Well, in a round about way he was losing potential sales, but not for that
reason. I had long ago decided that his product was a total pain. 8-)
Unfortunately there is no easy way (under RISC OS) to reliably
html attachments with embedded images which work in Pluto/NetSurf,
without wrapping them up in a zip file. Merely attaching a web page and
its images to a message doesn't work: the links in the HTML have to be
correctly written and this is done by windoze and other software if it's
used correctly. I suspect simple attachments were attempted by the
Not NetSurf's fault. Sorry for long post.
No worries, Tim. All grist to the mill.