On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 12:06 +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:50:24AM +0100, John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 11:23 +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > There is a single "regression" from this
alteration which is that the
> > pdf save exporter will not currently directly embed the original jpegs
> > into pdf...has anyone actually tested this with a modern haru? I have,
> > its broken anyway! I do intend to fix this but as a seperate piece of
> > work to make our haru handling less explody.
> Wise. I've no strong opinion on this regression.
Looking at it a bit more the haru lib apply *zero* sanity checking to
teh jpegs/png etc. supplied and as we retrieve them raw from the
Joy. I hadn't realised that haru was that lax.
I am beginning to think our "safely" decoded bitmaps should
used all the time.
Might be sensible. Of course, you pay the price with bloated PDF
> s/bitmap_tile/bitmap/ (and rename the function, too!)
> This applies to a number of other plotter implementations, too.
I know...I was thinking I should change as little as possible and let
the other frontend people alter them if they want...I am happy to
rename if thats more asthetically pleasing?
I think it is, yes.