On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 11:03:43AM -0800, ori(a)eigenstate.org wrote:
Quoth Thorsten Otto <admin(a)tho-otto.de>:
> On Sonntag, 24. Januar 2021 19:09:35 CET Jonas wrote:
> > What do you think?
> I think that a compiler that defines size_t to be 32bit on a 64bit system is
> broken ;)
It's perfectly legal -- size_t is required to hold
the maximum allowed object size. It's not required
to be able to span the address space, or anything
It's legal, but that doesn't have any relation to if it is sensible, or
if this is a bug.
Plan 9 is not sensible. And this is a bug in NetSurf.