On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 09:05:58 -0000, pop.popazerty(a)gmail.com wrote: Wonderful. Please do not send toolchain tarballs to the mailing list. It would be helpful to know what SH4 platform you are trying to support. Is this Linux/GTK in which case there's no need to provide a toolchain. Is it some other target which will require us to run a frontend etc for it? Please can you give more detail of what you are trying to support before trying to submit changes to us? D. -- Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 09:25:34 -0000, pop.popazerty(a)gmail.com wrote: Okay that sounds like you'll need to work on an appropriate branch of our toolchain/SDK repository first, and once you have that you can begin to work on a frontend for netsurf. If you can get the toolchain branch set up so that we can cross-build for the target then we can help you identify your next steps, but this is going to be a significant job to build a new frontend. It's not going to be a simple job. D. -- Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 10:00:15 -0000, pop.popazerty(a)gmail.com wrote: Then, much though it pains me to say, you're not going to get very far with your desire to have NetSurf on that target. None of the core devs have such a device, and thus no way to even begin to support it. You'd do best to look for a development community for the device and then work with them to build support for the idea. If you can get developers interested then introducing them to us will be a good first step. D. -- Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69

2020-06-08 11:25 GMT+02:00, pop.popazerty(a)gmail.com <pop.popazerty(a)gmail.com&gt;: Enigma2 looks like to be a Linux OS, so probably it should be just a custom build for netsurf on framebuffer or something?