On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:48:50PM +0000, Chris Young wrote:
> > Dare I suggest adding revamped frames support to that
> It certainly needs thinking about, yes. There's no way it'll get
> implemented for 2.5, though: it's far too invasive a change.
Of course, I meant the "potential future projects" list, not the "this
needs doing for 2.5" list. :) It might be a good candidate for GSoC.
I'd be concerned about letting a GSoC student at our frames code; not least of
which we actually need to fully understand the way it currently exists and how
it interacts with the content model before we can consider poking at it in a
rework/revamp/whatever way. Of course; if we got a prodigy student; it could
be a possiblity. Perhaps put it up as a "Difficulty: Fiendish" option.
Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69