Tinct for 64k colour modes
by John-Mark Bell
Richard,
I've just remembered about this. Have you a timescale for release? If
possible, it would be good to bundle it with the NetSurf 2.0 release.
J.
12 years, 5 months
Re: r7247 tlsa - in /trunk/netsurfweb: about/news.en index.en
by Chris Young
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:07:34 -0000, wrote:
> Add release news. Won't go live until Saturday.
Is there a press release written for this, erm, release? If so please
can I have a copy of it (to chris(a)unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk - not
chris.young@) so I can put it on the Amiga news sites on Saturday.
Are you able/willing to host the AmigaOS archive on
netsurf-browser.org? If so I can email it over once I've created it.
I'll probably be doing a final build late on Friday night so I can
upload to Aminet - Aminet tends to be updated overnight so the archive
should be there on Saturday morning.
If there are any objections or problems with this please let me know.
I would sort it all out on Saturday but I'm working :-(
Chris
12 years, 5 months
Re: GTK patches - fully merged, stable version
by Mark
Rob Kendrick wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I'm having trouble here. This tarball appears to include copies of the
>> Glade files, as well as a patch which neither applies to HEAD nor to
>> the Glade files you supply.
>>
>> Can you create a new diff from the current head, and include new files
>> in that diff rather than attaching them separately? (The graphical
>> image can be attached separately, obviously.)
>>
>> In the mean time, I'm off to cry about Glade and XML some more.
>>
Hi Rob,
I did see talk of me 'cleaning up' the code so I've improved the
presentation a bit, clearing the unreached functions, [I suppose there
are core functions that should handle printing layout after all, it's
simply a case of locating them] adding copyright notices to
gtk_source.c, gtk_source.h, preparing I18N support for the save source
messages, changing the wrapping in places as I had set my tabs to width
4, then noticed it makes a difference after all :-)
Best
Mark
http://www.halloit.com
Key ID 046B65CF
12 years, 5 months
BMPs decoded with wrong colours by libnsbmp
by Chris Young
libnsbmp decodes BMPs in the wrong colours. This is highly likely to
be an endian issue and all other formats decode correctly within
NetSurf.
Even decode_bmp generates a PPM with the wrong colours, so the
problem appears to be internal to libnsbmp.
eg. bmpsuite image g01bg.bmp shows up as yellow and magenta (it should
be blue and green - at least that's the colours I get everywhere
else!)
I notice the library has macros for reading values to avoid endian
issues but I don't see what else can be causing this? Is it actually
showing up with the correct colours on LE hardware?
Chris
12 years, 5 months
Re: GTK patches - fully merged, stable version
by Mark
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I'm having trouble here. This tarball appears to include copies of the
> Glade files, as well as a patch which neither applies to HEAD nor to
> the Glade files you supply.
>
> Can you create a new diff from the current head, and include new files
> in that diff rather than attaching them separately? (The graphical
> image can be attached separately, obviously.)
>
> In the mean time, I'm off to cry about Glade and XML some more.
>
Hi Rob,
Those glade files were the updated versions; the patch should have
fitted HEAD though;
hopefully the diff file attached includes all new files & is up-to-date
r7104;
the printing code in gtk_source.c is unreached for now so although
'needs work' :-) may serve as a basis for further development, is the
reason I left it in;
I hope the glade patching works; an alternative would be to directly
install the updated/new glade files [unchanged since the 20090408
patch], I suppose
Best
Mark
12 years, 5 months
GTK patches
by Daniel Silverstone
Hi,
I have been busy for the past several days and I know that I'm behind on
reviewing/merging patches from one or two of you. However I've noticed
that many revisions to those patches have been posted and to be honest
I'm now very confused as to which patch I should review.
Could anyone who has a patch pending related to the GTK stuff, please
follow-up directly to this message (on-list, not to me personally) and I
will see what I can do.
Regards,
Daniel.
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 2BC8 4016 2068 7895
12 years, 5 months
Downtime for lists and website
by Daniel Silverstone
Hi,
The hosting provider (Pepperfish) who host netsurf-browser.org will be
replacing their main server on Wednesday 15th April. This will entail an
amount of downtime for both netsurf-browser.org email and the website.
Mail to the lists will not be lost, but it won't get through for several
hours while things are migrated.
As a result, please expect list and website coverage to be patchy
between about 11:00 and 18:00 tomorrow. (UK time)
Regards,
Daniel.
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 2BC8 4016 2068 7895
12 years, 5 months
select widget
by Paweł Blokus
Hi
To better get to know the plotters API I started working on a plotters
based select widget. This patch replaces the pop-up menu with a list
displayed right under the gadget. I am sending it mainly to listen to
what you think of the direction taken so if you have any comments on
the appearance of the gadget or any necessary features, I think it
would be best to know at the initial steps of creating it :). I
consider it a draft and I know the code could be better organised and
less messy so please be understanding at the moment :). My current
todo list contains:
- adding an arrow to the box so that it resembles a combo box
- making the colours customizable
- adding a scroll for really long lists(I'll use the existing one)
- adding a representation of optgroup
- a better handling of mouse events(now it responds only to a click
without the slightest mouse move)
12 years, 5 months
GTK patches - fully merged, stable version
by edi
2009/4/9 Mark <markieb.lists.20090330(a)gmail.com>:
> Let's be fair Chris, there is one development malloc that should have
> been commented, at 937-938 of the diff file [gtk_tabs.c ~@@ -54,18
> +56,29 @@+26] :-)
Yeah, you're are right. My train didn't stop where he should have ;).
> thanks for the reminder though that I should add the free() during
> development [makes note to self] :-D
No problem, I expect the same from you :).
> As I say, the gtk errors with tabs are at least better in the patch than
> in trunk
It works, which is a good thing, however those errors are a thorn in my eye ;).
--
Regards,
Chris Tarnowski.
-------------------------------
PGP Key-Id: C33C A45D
IRC: _3d1
12 years, 5 months
