Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Additional error numbers and signal functions
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 21:05:10 +0100, Richard Ipsum wrote:
I've thought about this a bit more and I can see why you might be
reluctant
to merge it if it has the potential to break systems we don't know about.
The safest option is going to be to make all the new constants optional,
shall I resubmit this series with that alteration?
Please do. I'm sorry that I've been so slow. Been a bit busy. I'll review
and possibly merge your other stuff now.
D.
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.digital-scurf.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged. Key Id: 3CCE BABE 206C 3B69