On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:35:12PM +0100, Jonathan Maw wrote:
On 2013-05-21 14:30, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>This patch could do with an explanation in the commit message for
>removing libreadline, so that when we want to reconsider this, we
>find out why it was removed in the first place. Jonathan, could
>the commit with that?
Despite your phrasing as a question, I am fairly sure it's a request to
merge it with the commit amended.
Does "We want to avoid GPLv3 code in base systems, and would rather
the component than roll it back to a pre-GPLv3 state" work for you?
Sure, that's fine, though I would perhaps phrase it as
Because of GENIVI requirements, we want to avoid GPLv3 code in the
base systems, and would rather remove the component than roll it back
to a pre-GPLv3 state and maintain that ourselves for bug and
http://www.codethink.co.uk/ http://wiki.baserock.org/ http://www.baserock.com/