On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Would openstack-client-system-x86_32 be an acceptable system name?
* We don't need "base" in the name. It's not a base system
anymore, after all.
No, but that is the one it most resembles. We may decide to have openstack
devel systems too, at which point it would be openstack-client-devel...
* I don't feel we need the "generic" part either. I
think we should
drop that from the other system morphologies as well. I can live
with having it, though.
I'd prefer to keep it and remove it from all others at the same time if
we're doing that.
This naming discussion has gone on long enough, so I'm upgrading my +0
to a +1 for whatever name is finally decided.