Re: [PATCH 0/2] Definitions V8
On 18/02/16 18:45, Sam Thursfield wrote:
Hi Dan
+1 to this becoming version 8 of the definitions format, it will
definitely make working with submodules less of a faff.
Could you write a short description suitable for putting in the wiki?
All previous versions have one, see:
<http://wiki.baserock.org/definitions/historical/>;.
It would also be good to have text to add to the description of the
format at <http://wiki.baserock.org/definitions/current/>
I think this has long enough for complaints to come out... let's go
ahead with making definitions version 8 a thing. I'll merge
<https://gerrit.baserock.org/1869/>;. I'd appreciate if you could write
text for the wiki, I don't have time now.
Tiago mentioned on IRC that it would be better if the proposal was more
generic, which I agree with, but I think we can get there as a separate
step.
That was discussed back in November last year too:
<https://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/baserock-dev-baserock.org/201...;.
(And I think there was a patch for Morph that implemented that proposal,
which can hopefully be adapted to implement definitions V8).
Sam
--
Sam Thursfield, Codethink Ltd.
Office telephone: +44 161 236 5575